little ruddiger said:
It seemed to me then and now what a waste it was for these young people showing the dedication to pay for and attend school for two years and were left flopping in the wind at the end. The same way I felt when attending ATS testing, here are people obviously showing at least some interest in law enforcement and the police services themselves showing no interest in them and removing themselves from their own hiring process.
The OACP, police services and Ministry of CSCS should be taking a more active role in PFP at community colleges because that is where you pick the apples from the tree. If the recruiting process began with college admission and there was interaction with recruiters, students and instructors over the two years before graduation that would be a much better assessment of the applicants skills, abilities and dedication.
Please tell me where its says that a potential applicant MUST take police foundations to get on a service in Ontario. Oh whats that you can't, because there is NO requirement for anybody to waste thier money on police foundations training. Yeah thought so. Its NOT the responsibility of any police service to make sure you have a job waiting for you when/if you graduate from a PFP/LASA program. Also do you even know why most police services follow the OACP testing. It is to ensure a STANDARD test across the board, so an applicant can apply to many services without having to take a dozen different tests for each one. It also ensures the smaller services don't have to spend limited resources on administering these test on a regular basis. You may not like the fact that you have to redo a fitness every six months and pay ATS, but the simple fact is physical fitness is perishable. As well ATS charges the same amount for testing as the OPP does (and Toronto when they did OACP testing). Don't like testing with ATS go test with the OPP.
The current recruiting process is arbitrary and fickle decision are being made by an NCO who doesn't want to work nights and who doesn't have to justify there actions to anyone especially not the applicant. The security industry is worse because it is public safety provided by the lowest bidder, and in many cases it shows. Security companies have no standards other than be 18, no record and entitled to work in Canada. That is why in most cases you can make more money at McDonald's or Tim Horton's and I am dead serious about that.
Right :
How about you fill in your profile, or at least explain how it is that you came to the conclusion the recruiting process is "arbitrary" and the "fickle decisions" are being made by lazy NCO. Do you know any recruiters personally? (I do, a former D/Sgt from TPS recruiting is one of my college profs) Have you ever worked in police recruiting? Until you tell us who you are, no one is going to take anything you say seriously, because you just sound like someone who is bitter about not being hired by a police service. Get over yourself and just deal with the fact that you were simply not good enough to get hired. The fact is the recruiters DO have to justify thier actions to those who are above them (thier immediate supervisor usually a Sgt/SSGt, who then has to get approval of the HR manager).
As to the security angle, again what is your experience working in this field? Because again your generalizing, and do not know what you are talking about. Are there some companies that have very low standards as you describe. Yes there are, but they are in the minority. I have worked for a few companies and each one had thier own internal training programs that covered a wide range of areas (use of force, powers of arrest, TPA, handcuffing, baton training, K9 training, etc.) as well their is legislation in the works that will make training a mandatory requirement (its in third reading I believe and should be passed in a few months).
Slow down zipperhead we are on the same side here.
No need to be nasty. In answer to your delicately worded queries; it is a violation of the Charter to discriminate based on ethnicity or gender, if you are a cop you should know that. After all the Charter is the paramount law of the land. The little "voluntary" questionnaire that asks you to self-identify based on race should be removed Under S.15.
Like you said voluntary, you don't like it, don't fill it out.
I do believe that under represented segments of the population should be encouraged to apply. It is true the majority of hires, despite all the efforts to attract others, are white males and that is because the vast majority of applications are from white males. The numbers you quote from your service are not in line with most the services I have read about as far as tint and genitals of their new recruits but that is neither here nor there.
Wait now you are contridicting yourself, becuase you earlier stated that white males have no chance of getting on (based on your own failed attempts), but now you have come to the realization that is not in fact the case.
I also feel that those getting the jobs should be the best applicants and should have the character, skills and aptitudes that will serve them well on the street. My contention is that the police services are being lazy when it comes to determining this. Having more meaningfull involvement in the community college programs is a better way to see the potential in candidates. Contracting out your hiring process and a panel interview designed to scare them are not the best practices.
Again what experience do you have to make the statement that police services are not selecting the best candidates for the job? The fact that you weren't hired? That doesn't cut it. Have you researched/compared other recruiting methods and how they relate to the current methods in use now ? Have you studied officers who have made it through this process and compared them (on the basis of any number factors like how many civillian complaints lodge against them over time, arrest and clearance records, commendations received etc.) to officers who have gone through other recruiting processes. Again until you can show us your experience as it relates to designing/studying/implement recruiting policies your opinions and statements will come off as nothing more than a bitter, failed applicant.