• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Canada says it will look at increasing its defence spending and tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever growing sanctions list.

By Tonda MacCharles
Ottawa Bureau
Mon., March 7, 2022

Riga, LATVIA—On the 13th day of the brutal Russian bid to claim Ukraine as its own, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is showing up at the Latvian battle group led by Canadian soldiers, waving the Maple Leaf and a vague hint at more money for the military.

Canada has been waving the NATO flag for nearly seven years in Latvia as a bulwark against Russia’s further incursions in Eastern Europe.

Canada stepped up to lead one of NATO’s four battle groups in 2015 — part of the defensive alliance’s display of strength and solidarity with weaker member states after Russia invaded Ukraine and seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014. Trudeau arrived in the Latvian capital late Monday after meetings in the U.K. with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Earlier Monday, faced with a seemingly unstoppable war in Ukraine, Trudeau said he will look at increasing Canada’s defence spending. Given world events, he said there are “certainly reflections to have.”

And Canada tacked on 10 more Russian names to an ever-growing sanctions list.

The latest round of sanctions includes names Trudeau said were identified by jailed Russian opposition leader and Putin nemesis Alexei Navalny.

However, on a day when Trudeau cited the new sanctions, and Johnson touted new measures meant to expose Russian property owners in his country, Rutte admitted sanctions are not working.

Yet they all called for more concerted international efforts over the long haul, including more economic measures and more humanitarian aid, with Johnson and Rutte divided over how quickly countries need to get off Russian oil and gas.

The 10 latest names on Canada’s target list do not include Roman Abramovich — a Russian billionaire Navalny has been flagging to Canada since at least 2017. Canada appears to have sanctioned about 20 of the 35 names on Navalny’s list.

The Conservative opposition says the Liberal government is not yet exerting maximum pressure on Putin, and should do more to bolster Canadian Forces, including by finally approving the purchase of fighter jets.

Foreign affairs critic Michael Chong said in an interview that Ottawa must still sanction “additional oligarchs close to President Putin who have significant assets in Canada.”

Abramovich owns more than a quarter of the public shares in steelmaking giant Evraz, which has operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan and has supplied most of the steel for the government-owned Trans Mountain pipeline project.

Evraz’s board of directors also includes two more Russians the U.S. government identified as “oligarchs” in 2019 — Aleksandr Abramov and Aleksandr Frolov — and its Canadian operations have received significant support from the federal government.

That includes at least $27 million in emergency wage subsidies during the pandemic, as well as $7 million through a fund meant to help heavy-polluters reduce emissions that cause climate change, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

In addition to upping defence spending, the Conservatives want NORAD’s early warning system upgraded, naval shipbuilding ramped up and Arctic security bolstered.

In London, Johnson sat down with Trudeau and Rutte at the Northolt airbase. Their morning meetings had a rushed feel, with Johnson starting to usher press out before Trudeau spoke. His office said later that the British PM couldn’t squeeze the full meeting in at 10 Downing Street because Johnson’s “diary” was so busy that day. The three leaders held an afternoon news conference at 10 Downing.

But before that Trudeau met with the Queen, saying she was “insightful” and they had a “useful, for me anyway, conversation about global affairs.”

Trudeau meets with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Tuesday in Latvia.

The prime minister will also meet with three Baltic leaders, the prime ministers of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, in the Latvian capital of Riga.

The Liberals announced they would increase the 500 Canadian Forces in Latvia by another 460 troops. The Canadians are leading a multinational battle group, one of four that are part of NATO’s deployments in the region.

Another 3,400 Canadians could be deployed to the region in the months to come, on standby for NATO orders.

But Canada’s shipments of lethal aid to Ukraine were slow to come in the view of the Conservatives, and the Ukrainian Canadian community.

And suddenly Western allies are eyeing each other’s defence commitments.

At the Downing Street news conference, Rutte noted the Netherlands will increase its defence budget to close to two per cent of GDP. Germany has led the G7, and doubled its defence budget in the face of Putin’s invasion and threats. Johnson said the U.K. defence spending is about 2.4 per cent and declined to comment on Canada’s defence spending which is 1.4 per cent of GDP.

But Johnson didn’t hold back.

“What we can’t do, post the invasion of Ukraine is assume that we go back to a kind of status quo ante, a kind of new normalization in the way that we did after the … seizure of Crimea and the Donbas area,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to recognize that things have changed and that we need a new focus on security and I think that that is kind of increasingly understood by everybody.”

Trudeau stood by his British and Dutch counterparts and pledged Canada would do more.

He defended his government’s record, saying Ottawa is gradually increasing spending over the next decade by 70 per cent. Then Trudeau admitted more might be necessary.

“We also recognize that context is changing rapidly around the world and we need to make sure that women and men have certainty and our forces have all the equipment necessary to be able to stand strongly as we always have. As members of NATO. We will continue to look at what more we can do.”

The three leaders — Johnson, a conservative and Trudeau and Rutte, progressive liberals — in a joint statement said they “will continue to impose severe costs on Russia.”

Arriving for the news conference from Windsor Castle, Trudeau had to detour to enter Downing Street as loud so-called Freedom Convoy protesters bellowed from outside the gate. They carried signs marked “Tuck Frudeau” and “Free Tamara” (Lich).

Protester Jeff Wyatt who said he has no Canadian ties told the Star he came to stand up for Lich and others who were leading a “peaceful protest” worldwide against government “lies” about COVID-19 and what he called Trudeau’s “tyranny.”

Elsewhere in London, outside the Russian embassy, other protesters and passersby reflected on what they said was real tyranny — the Russian attack on Ukraine. “I think we should be as tough as possible to get this stopped, as tough as possible,” said protester Clive Martinez.
 
With that established it then becomes a fight between the feds and the provinces to see who can spend more and who gets the most credit for that spending.
I think that, to an extent, there is a legitimate national purpose in redistributing wealth between the provinces in order to ensure an equal minimum standard of essential services, however, you are bang on and we are no longer at just that task but in a campaign of buying the vote through largesse. I have a hard time seeing how universal child care and dental care is a federal issue.

Most Canadians, way over 75% of them at an educated guess, put national defence down near the bottom of their GaF list - down near support for symphony orchestras and ballet companies.
And based on the recent questionnaire I received from Poilievere on what concerns me as a citizen and voter, and the total absence of anything remotely resembling national defence or security in it, it's not even on his GaF list. The party does have a 2% of GDP mandate in its policy paper but the rest of that is so screwed up that it's incoherent and offers no hint of what the extra $ would be spent on. - My guess, more cubicles in Ottawa.

😖
 
What happens if....

Goose Bay is revived as an active NATO training base but....

With a live GBAD-CRAM unit,
Enhancing drone launching capability to include the Kratos Mako UTAP-22 to complement the Kratos BQMs

Kratos-Mako-Tactical-UAS.jpg
Target_drones_BQM_177A_29_May_2019.5cee973471c0e.png


Add in an MQ(CQ)-9B overwatch capability and then allow manned aircraft into the environment for training purposes.

NATO scores a useful training environment.
Canada scores useful training, new kit, an experimental facility, new capabilities and international kudos
Politicians score Newfy votes.
 
If the Trudeau mouth is open you are hearing a lie. He's proved he's completely undependable except to create disasters.
The WEF and UN control his actions not to mention the Chinese communist party. He spends others $$ like it was water.
For a brighter outlook watch YouTube Dr John Campbell for accurate covid and other news.
 
Deja vu. The PC government of the '80s was full of well-meaning ideas for improving Canadian military capability, but had to deal with a fiscal crisis. The first order of business of any fiscally responsible federal government has to be to get the operating budget balanced, and then to see whether there's anything practical that can be done about the net budget deficit (which at that point would be mainly cost of servicing debt).

There isn't any "new money" for anything. Almost everyone has a hand out asking for more money. People with grievances want payoffs, unions want theirs to be the best-compensated province in all of Canada, people with fuzzy skills want a government-funded teat, people in communities that shouldn't exist want endless subsidies to build and re-build in perpetuity, people in high-demand occupations want theirs to be chosen as the one funded to have as many workers as are needed, people who don't have as much mad money as they would like want more individual transfers from governments and are unwilling to step back from any they already have.

Interest rates are reasonable by recent historical standards, but we make it increasingly difficult (costly) to build anything. We can't know whether there is another boom (eg. '90s dot-com) around the corner to help. Some people are obsessed with gutting the energy economy we have while demanding we somehow pay to develop the energy economy of the future. And a not inconsiderable fraction of mostly urban-dwelling people are determined to piss off their rural cousins in whose backyards resides much of the infrastructure needed to sustain dense urban populations.
 
Frankly no party will invest more money in the CAF because the inevitable result will be a procurement nightmare and they’ll take the heat for the ensuing scandal. We’re backed into a corner with no solutions beyond very serious, boring, and complicated policy adjustment.
 
If the Trudeau mouth is open you are hearing a lie. He's proved he's completely undependable except to create disasters.
The WEF and UN control his actions not to mention the Chinese communist party. He spends others $$ like it was water.
For a brighter outlook watch YouTube Dr John Campbell for accurate covid and other news.

Out of curiosity do you find it easier to fit the tin oil to your head or is some kind of a chin strap better?
 
Better late than never... which is going to feel like 'never' by the time we get the stuff issued:


Canadian military rushing to buy new weapons after lessons learned from Ukraine war​


The Canadian Army is rushing to buy new equipment in response to lessons learned from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Canadian Army commander Lt.-Gen. Joe Paul says that includes anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles as well as systems to protect against drones.

Paul says the military is also hoping to purchase the types of long-range, precision missile systems that have given Ukrainian forces a distinct advantage over their Russian foes.

The new weapon systems were not included in the Liberal government’s defence policy when it was released five years ago.

But Paul says the need for such equipment has emerged as the Canadian Armed Forces has closely watched and studied the fighting in Ukraine since February.

Paul says one challenge in obtaining the equipment is that many of Canada’s allies have come to the same conclusions about what they need, and are moving to buy the same stuff.


 
What happens if....

Goose Bay is revived as an active NATO training base but....

With a live GBAD-CRAM unit,
Enhancing drone launching capability to include the Kratos Mako UTAP-22 to complement the Kratos BQMs

Kratos-Mako-Tactical-UAS.jpg
Target_drones_BQM_177A_29_May_2019.5cee973471c0e.png


Add in an MQ(CQ)-9B overwatch capability and then allow manned aircraft into the environment for training purposes.

NATO scores a useful training environment.
Canada scores useful training, new kit, an experimental facility, new capabilities and international kudos
Politicians score Newfy votes.
Everyone posted there quits is what happens
 
I live in Montreal, and have contacts with some people in the Haitian diaspora here. They are the most conceited people when it comes to their country of origin, with this great belief that Haiti actually matters in the world and that the world actually cares about what goes on in Haiti. Only people in Canada who actually care (outside that diaspora) are the Liberals, and only to the extent that it can get them votes in esat-end Montreal ridings.
If these folks are so-to-trot to liberate Haiti, give them weapons, train them, and send them back to Haiti to sort things out.
 
Random thought, if the CAF is short 8-10,000 personnel from total authorized where is the department and CAF redirecting the excess funding that would be paying salaries, allowances etc.?
Is it going to recruiting, modernization, O&M, piling up or returning to the centre?
Government departments don't get funding in the normal sense, they get allocations. They don't lay out a budget then get a big bag of money sometime after April 1st. Money not spent doesn't 'go back' to the Centre - it never left.
What happens if....

Goose Bay is revived as an active NATO training base but....

With a live GBAD-CRAM unit,
Enhancing drone launching capability to include the Kratos Mako UTAP-22 to complement the Kratos BQMs

Kratos-Mako-Tactical-UAS.jpg
Target_drones_BQM_177A_29_May_2019.5cee973471c0e.png


Add in an MQ(CQ)-9B overwatch capability and then allow manned aircraft into the environment for training purposes.

NATO scores a useful training environment.
Canada scores useful training, new kit, an experimental facility, new capabilities and international kudos
Politicians score Newfy votes.
Aboriginal push-back. Caribou herds and all that.
 
What happens if....

Goose Bay is revived as an active NATO training base but....
I thought that everyone was united in hating 5 Wing Goose Bay — the locals (who protest it), the CAF (whose families hate living there) and our Allies (who hate the bad press from the protests).

Everyone except one person. Former MND O’Connor wanted to revitalize it and put a light infantry battalion there — presumably as some form of penal battalion.
 
I thought that everyone was united in hating 5 Wing Goose Bay — the locals (who protest it), the CAF (whose families hate living there) and our Allies (who hate the bad press from the protests).

Everyone except one person. Former MND O’Connor wanted to revitalize it and put a light infantry battalion there — presumably as some form of penal battalion.

Being a former CO of the RCD, presumably 1st Bn The RCR, to free up more space for his regiment in Petawawa...
 
What happens if....

Goose Bay is revived as an active NATO training base but....

With a live GBAD-CRAM unit,
Enhancing drone launching capability to include the Kratos Mako UTAP-22 to complement the Kratos BQMs

Kratos-Mako-Tactical-UAS.jpg
Target_drones_BQM_177A_29_May_2019.5cee973471c0e.png


Add in an MQ(CQ)-9B overwatch capability and then allow manned aircraft into the environment for training purposes.

NATO scores a useful training environment.
Canada scores useful training, new kit, an experimental facility, new capabilities and international kudos
Politicians score Newfy votes.
I sincerely doubt you’d earn many votes given the locals dislike of the existing facility. You’d see most posted there releasing as soon as humanly possible; unless they truly hated themselves, their spouses, and wished ill upon their children.
 
I sincerely doubt you’d earn many votes given the locals dislike of the existing facility. You’d see most posted there releasing as soon as humanly possible; unless they truly hated themselves, their spouses, and wished ill upon their children.

YVR has acres of languishing terrain they're looking to monetize in some way. The CAF should make them an offer and move back in to the South Terminal area.


As part of the Financial Sustainability lens of our 2022-2024 Strategic Plan, we outlined how we will aim to drive value from land assets to diversify our revenues and grow our core airport business while supporting regional economic development. To strengthen the non-passenger related business to a higher proportion than in the past, we will put our land assets into productive use, expanding our focus in cargo and logistics, and activating digital opportunities.

In February 2022, the Minister of Transport formally approved the proposed amendment to YVR’s 2037 Land Use Plan. We’re exploring new and innovative ways to strengthen our role as a diverse global hub while aligning YVR to the future growth and needs of British Columbia. This includes unlocking development opportunities on Sea Island that will benefit our community and the economy that supports it.

 
Everyone posted there quits is what happens

So the reality is that the reason the CAF can't hire is nobody wants to go to sea and nobody wants to live in those parts of Canada that are not served by Starbucks.

You know we could save a lot of money by turning the 93% of the land that isn't arable, equivalent to that served by Starbucks, back to the First Nations and negotiating lumber and mineral claims with them directly.

main-qimg-8b421752ee6e80b885af7d3654b9cc72-pjlq
 
I thought that everyone was united in hating 5 Wing Goose Bay — the locals (who protest it), the CAF (whose families hate living there) and our Allies (who hate the bad press from the protests).

Everyone except one person. Former MND O’Connor wanted to revitalize it and put a light infantry battalion there — presumably as some form of penal battalion.

Fair enough. Move the GBAD/Drone/UAS range to Cold Lake. I understand that to be an equally popular posting.
 
So the reality is that the reason the CAF can't hire is nobody wants to go to sea and nobody wants to live in those parts of Canada that are not served by Starbucks.

You know we could save a lot of money by turning the 93% of the land that isn't arable, equivalent to that served by Starbucks, back to the First Nations and negotiating lumber and mineral claims with them directly.

main-qimg-8b421752ee6e80b885af7d3654b9cc72-pjlq
No people want to go to sea; they just don’t want to do it while jumping from ship to ship working for and officer corps that spends 1/3 of the time at sea as them.

They don’t want Starbucks; they want their partners to have jobs and their kids to be have the opportunity to go to schools and partake in extra curricular activities. They do not want to live in a Gulag in the most remote part of the Country.
 
Nobody says that any posting has to be permanent. Seasonal campaigns. Two weeks on - Two weeks off. The civilian world uses a variety of solutions to those types of problems. -- Different thread -- overlap.
 
Back
Top