• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Replacing the Subs

A bit more on Cellula


Interesting Concept of Operations video for the Canadian Arctic at the link.
No reason we couldn't deploy seafloor sensors now with AOPS and have small surface craft monitor them.

I have serious doubts about the ability of a UUV to work effectively under ice in the NWP though with currents, the tons of low frequency noise interfering with detection, comms, navigation, etc.
 
No reason we couldn't deploy seafloor sensors now with AOPS and have small surface craft monitor them.

I have serious doubts about the ability of a UUV to work effectively under ice in the NWP though with currents, the tons of low frequency noise interfering with detection, comms, navigation, etc.

Who says they all have to work all the time? The advantage of a multi-nodal system is redundancy. If only 50% of the net is up you can still maintain connectivity. And if the nodes are in constant motion they are less likely to be damaged in the first place.
 
The author is covering so many different opinions in one article it is nonsensical.

"We need destroyers and anti-sub patrol aircraft.. but we should focus more on housing affordability, protecting Canada from forest fires, and stay away from offensive weapons that make the world more unsafe because it will provoke the hoatile actors who already are at war with us...."

Tell me you have zero knowledge on defense and security matters without telling me you have zero knowledtlge on defense and secuirty matters...

It sounded typically Canadian to me.
 

Critics attack long timelines in defence plan as military awaits a budget boost


The defence policy says DND will study options to replace the navy's submarines. Both Blair and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have said the submarines will be replaced — that it's a matter of when and how, not if.

The prime minister even went a step further and suggested nuclear-powered submarines are among the possible options — something Eyre said surprised him.

"We don't have firm direction on that," Eyre said, indicating the navy has proposed acquiring between eight and 12 conventionally-powered submarines.

"Within the military, we are not pursuing a nuclear option. However, discussions are early. As we take a look at what would be required for a nuclear capability versus what we realistically have, that is an option that I personally doubt will be further explored or further developed. That being said, we remain open to all options."

IMO, these remarks are simply political speak for a losing gov't who is trying to capture votes. The LPC with the NPD signed several bills committing a significant amount of money into social programs without paying much attention to shepherding and encouraging businesses with tax costs or more friendly regulations to ensure future economic growth. Given the current budget deficit and the growing pressure caused by managing it, there will not be much leeway by any gov't to adequately fund national defence/security priorities.

When the PM mentioned the possbility of acquiring nuclear submarines and the CDS was suprised to hear that, this means to me that the PM was speaking out of his ass. Of course this is political speak to make it look like the gov't is "exploring all options" - which means we will talk about it but do minimal work or window dressing to make it look like we are exploring without committing any major amounts funds to really explore the options.

Realistically, based on the current financial situation - replacement of the Victoria Class submarines will not happen, or if it does, it will be a classic case of fitted for, but not with in order to make it affordable.

BLUF: Canada will not get the right submarines it desparately requires.
 

Critics attack long timelines in defence plan as military awaits a budget boost




IMO, these remarks are simply political speak for a losing gov't who is trying to capture votes. The LPC with the NPD signed several bills committing a significant amount of money into social programs without paying much attention to shepherding and encouraging businesses with tax costs or more friendly regulations to ensure future economic growth. Given the current budget deficit and the growing pressure caused by managing it, there will not be much leeway by any gov't to adequately fund national defence/security priorities.

When the PM mentioned the possbility of acquiring nuclear submarines and the CDS was suprised to hear that, this means to me that the PM was speaking out of his ass. Of course this is political speak to make it look like the gov't is "exploring all options" - which means we will talk about it but do minimal work or window dressing to make it look like we are exploring without committing any major amounts funds to really explore the options.

Realistically, based on the current financial situation - replacement of the Victoria Class submarines will not happen, or if it does, it will be a classic case of fitted for, but not with in order to make it affordable.

BLUF: Canada will not get the right submarines it desparately requires.

Usually the BLUF goes at the start. ;)
 
This should be a cautionary tale for those who push nuclear subs on this forum. Even with an increase to the Australian defence budget to 2.4% of GDP, significant cuts to other programs will be required to support that acquisition.

 
This should be a cautionary tale for those who push nuclear subs on this forum. Even with an increase to the Australian defence budget to 2.4% of GDP, significant cuts to other programs will be required to support that acquisition.

From the article:

The shadow defense minister, former SAS captain Andrew Hastie, sharply criticized Marles and the government over the strategy, saying Marles used “vague, bureaucratic language in talking about our defense strategy.”

“We are still no clearer on what ‘impactful projection’ is, or how it will work for the ADF,” Hastie said at a press conference following Marles’ speech. “There is a lack of clarity about Labor’s design for the ADF and how the constituent parts will work together.”
Hmm…almost like the criticisms against our NSF…
 
This should be a cautionary tale for those who push nuclear subs on this forum. Even with an increase to the Australian defence budget to 2.4% of GDP, significant cuts to other programs will be required to support that acquisition.

Per the bottom of the article, which 2 Joint Supply Ships were terminated? I thought they were increasing the number of surface ships, which ostensibly need supplies …
 
This should be a cautionary tale for those who push nuclear subs on this forum. Even with an increase to the Australian defence budget to 2.4% of GDP, significant cuts to other programs will be required to support that acquisition.

Well if they where in NATO they would supposed to be working to 3% :)

Canada is also in a much better position to adopt Nuke boats that Australia - having a domestic nuclear industry already, as better rationale given the Arctic and Range needed for Pacific movement in times of crisis - as well as the fact that you are next door to the SME's on Nuke boats.

Interestingly enough there is a lot of angst here about AUKUS, as we are basically taking a bath on the costs of the Virginias to supply Australia initially, as well as the tech transfers and training that will be done.
 
Back
Top