They didn't really separate much. Only Congress is restrained. John Adams was most likely correct when he claimed "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." The US constitution took a lot of power out of the hands...
Putting more power in the hands of renters might help against a few abusive landlords, but it tends to decrease the supply of rentals among people who only have one or two, don't really need the money, and can't afford the risk of even one problem tenant, once.
If the authorities with...
Not necessarily. Crudely, the money supply only increases when the BoC increases it to step in to buy bonds which are not purchased by ordinary institutions. (And if the BoC sells those financial instruments into the market, it can reduce the money supply.)
As for all the rest of the bad...
Please don't perpetuate fiscal ignorance. The BoC works to bring down inflation by raising interest rates. The GoC has been actively working against that by overspending and running large deficits.
I paid into EI all my working life and was never able to claim anything. How refreshing it would have been if it were actual insurance to cover unforeseen unfortunate events, and not a kitty to be raided for new social spending that should have been paid out of general revenues if the feds...
I wouldn't expect the Res F to receive any of the high flyers, but if the Reg F has enough indifferent and incompetent people at LCol rank to oversee, say, 20 consolidated groupings ("battalion groups"), then the army has problems very much greater than Res F reform. As for abusive and...
I can guess that a confidential poll would find that the overwhelming majority of reservists - the ones not in or imminently lining up for a CO's or RSM's appointment - would like that. The fact that occasional ex-Reg thuds have wound up in high positions in Res F units isn't proof that nothing...
I wasn't thinking of "intent" as "not by accident", but I see how that applies. I can't imagine trying to argue that a senior politician in his prime couldn't read markings or otherwise know that something was classified, or imagine a scenario in which someone is compelled to remove documents...
What, trust is important? We can't misuse the powers of our institutions and stretch them beyond recognition without adverse effects? There are consequences of repeated misstatement, understatement, overstatement, and obfuscation of important facts and context?
I've never been in court. Isn't that how it works? Counsel objects; if the judge rules against him, he objects more loudly so that the judge changes his mind?
Same as Biden and his ghostwriter.
[Add and as to this: "Forgot to return and then returned when found" - people, let that line of argument go. Biden knew what he had and knew what he was providing to Zwontizer.]
"Intent" doesn't matter in the classified documents cases, with respect to criminal charges for possessing stuff that isn't permitted. Intent and cooperation (with investigators) might be mitigating factors for sentencing. People keep referring to Biden's cooperation as if it matters to his...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.